Lindermann, D. J, C. A. Rush and S. J. Tepper (2014) ‘An Asymmetrical Portrait: Exploring Gendered Income Inequality in the Arts’ In: The Southern Sociological Society (vol. 3, no. 4) pp. 332-348.
The journal was useful for me looking at the pay gap between men and women in the art world. The authors looked at the Strategic National Art Alumni project, which accessed the incomes for artists and non artists, and found that the pay gap between the genders were comparable. The project found that women didn’t suffer from a wage decrease due to motherhood.
However research conducted by the Institute for women’s policy research in 2015 found that there were only two professions where men out-earned women, and they are a stock clerk/order filler and health practitioner support technologists. From my research in other sources, many found a gap in wages among artists. Whether this was a difference in working conditions or this project was wrong.
The authors of this article believes reasons for the inequality could be anything from discrimination, differences in networks, segregation or family dynamics. The do state that many artists are self-employed and this bring flexibility which would benefit women. The articles brings up various studies and resources which looks gender in the arts. They discuss how men and women work in the arts, for example there is a reliance on networking which benefits men. They look at the actual pay, and state that “female artistic workers earn significantly less than males”.
Another quote they used is by Katz and Ksansnak, “Cultural attitudes to concerning masculine gender roles are more rigid than this concerning feminine roles” (Katz and Ksansnak quoted in Lindermann, Rush and Tepper, 2014).
(Lindermann, Rush & Tepper, 2014; Stewart, G).